I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36。51吃瓜对此有专业解读
「他們的政策造成了高物價。我們的政策正在迅速終結這些問題」。谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】是该领域的重要参考
德索托最终没能走上总理岗位，这个变化本身，反而比任何一次就任更有象征意义。一个国家在宣布任命、撤回任命、再任命的反复之间，暴露的不是个人命运，而是制度预期的脆弱。在这种环境下，无论请来的是德索托，还是任何一位“明星经济学家”，恐怕都很难单凭个人之力改变局面。，更多细节参见搜狗输入法下载
早在 2000 年代初，Google 就曾大规模扫描图书馆馆藏，同样引发了长达十年的诉讼。最终法院认定Google 的做法属于「合理使用」，因为它只提供片段摘要，目的是引导读者找到书，而不是取代书本身。